Every year I take a look at the Allocations in my retirement plan Target Date/Lifecycle funds. I have Qualified Plans with both my (current) private sector employer and funds I left with TSP when I resigned as a Fed a few years ago.
If you look at the same Target Date (I’m focusing on 2030), the TSP has a much more conservative allocation than the Brokerage houses like Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard:
“If everything I’ve done is Wrong… then the Opposite must be Right”.
This is the time of year when people make (or break) New Years’ Resolutions. For those who follow Tim Ferriss, there is an alternate implementation of the Resolution where you instead do a year-end review, tabulate what was Positive and Negative in the past year, then resolve to avoid the biggest Negatives in the coming year.
Here’s an interesting retirement case study for you.
Let’s take a former active duty veteran who resigns after 7 years of service and enters the civilian workforce in the year 2000. This purely hypothetical employee in turn contributes to a Defined Contribution plan (401k or TSP) during his years as a working stiff. He or she contributes to the maximum ‘match’ amount of the employer’s plan- That is, when the employer matches up to 50% of contributions on up to 10% of salary, he contributes 10%. When he is a Federal Employee, he contributes 5% to get the most of the TSP automatic and matching contributions (5% of salary). (Stop me if you’ve figured out who the hypothetical employee is by now).
If you recall from last year, I resolved to roll all my IRA assets BACK in the the TSP, based on the following facts and theories:
- (Fact) TSP will soon allow much more withdrawal flexibility,
- (Fact) I’m not smarter than the market,
- (Fact) TSP Lifecycle funds have the lowest fees of any target-date fund, and
- (Theory) TSP Lifecycle funds are the best target-date funds available based on their cash-equivalent fund (the G Fund).
… so how about #4? Any way to prove this theory in to fact?